Skip to content

Study Finds That Youngest Children In Class May Just Be Immature and Don’t Need ADHD Drugs

Age at when children first start kindergarten is controversial, with many parents choosing to keep children (especially boys) home an additional year. There is also concern that so many children are diagnosed with ADHD and given prescription medications for it from a young age.

The results of a recent large study suggest that we absolutely should be rethinking when children start school, we should be more flexible about it, and not be so quick to diagnose ADHD in young children. Instead of just looking at a child's age, assess a child's school readiness.

The study found that the youngest children in a class are more likely to be prescribed ADHD medications, which may be unnecessary. It's not ADHD (characterized by concentration difficulties, hyperactivity and impulsivity), it's just immaturity. The youngest children are immature compared to the older children in a class.

Thus the prescriptions for "behavior problems" may be totally unnecessary. These children are overmedicated! The study also found that if the youngest in the class were born prematurely, then it's like a double whammy against them.

By the way, in the United States, one additional problem is that kindergarten has become more like first grade (lots of worksheets and sitting still for long periods). And many schools have eliminated recess totally - time when children can move, play, and get rid of excess energy.

From Medical Xpress: Study suggests the youngest children in class are being overmedicated for ADHD

Christine Strand Bachmann has led a study that includes all Norwegian children born between 1989 and 1998, a total of 488,000 people.

The NTNU Ph.D. candidate has reviewed all the prescriptions the children received from the age of 10 until they were 23. She compared children born in January or February with those born in November or December. [NOTE: later in the same year.]

"We found major differences in the prescription of ADHD medication. Children born in November-December had an 80% higher risk of being prescribed ADHD medication, compared to those born in January-February. This finding applies to children who were born at term," says Bachmann.

The researcher believes this indicates that the youngest children are being overmedicated.

"I think the increased ADHD medication for the youngest children in the cohort has to do with the way we organize our education system. Put simply, it looks like we're medicating the most immature children because we're comparing them to their oldest classmates, who are a whole year older," she says.

"This shouldn't be the basis for receiving an ADHD diagnosis. We have to expect that a child born in November is going to be less mature than a February child born the same year. Of course we can't stop diagnosing ADHD and giving medicine to those who need it. But what we see here is something else."

In particular, Bachmann studied children who were born prematurely, before the 37th week of pregnancy. The use of ADHD medication is higher for these children than their peers who were born at term. The tendency for the premature children is the same as for full-term—ADHD medication occurs most frequently among the youngest in the class.

"In that sense, the youngest premature children carry a double burden. The disadvantage of being born late in the year comes on top of the disadvantages of being a preemie," says the researcher.

Bachmann found another negative effect for premature children. ADHD prescriptions decreased with age among the full-term children, but the same did not happen for the preterm children who continued to be prescribed ADHD medication at the same level into early adulthood.

ADHD is characterized by concentration difficulties, hyperactivity and impulsivity beyond what is normal for the child's age.

"The findings indicate that the school situation is the cause of excess ADHD diagnoses. One solution could be for the children in question to wait to start school until the following year," she said.

Bachmann points out that studies from Denmark, which has a more flexible approach to delayed school starts, do not show an increased use of ADHD medication among the youngest pupils in the class. Forty percent of Danish children born in October-December postpone their school start until the next year.

"In Denmark, parents and kindergartens are involved in assessing a child's school readiness. I believe we could do something similar for our youngest children in Norway. Premature babies born late in the year could especially benefit from this approach. Some of them would actually have started a year later if they had been full-term."

Bachmann is not advocating that all "autumn children" should postpone their school start, which would merely shift the problem.

"We think that this could be relevant for the most vulnerable children. They should be individually assessed, with a focus on the child's particular needs. Having the right follow-up and good support measures for this group is also important, both in the education system and in the healthcare system," she says.

The study also looked at the use of other types of medication, such as for depression, anxiety, psychoses and sleeping pills.

"We found the same age effect for several of these drugs as well. Clearly more children born late in the year are receiving this kind of medication, compared to the oldest ones in the class. This was the case for both full-term and preterm babies," Bachmann said.

"But later in adolescence, from ages 15–23, this inequality disappeared. Children who were born late in the year in this age group didn't use more of these medicines than those who were born early in the same year. This also applied to the preemies," says Bachmann.

Data for the study was taken from the Medical birth registry of Norway, the Norwegian Prescription Database, and Statistics Norway.

Hege Andersson Nordhus, who heads the daily operations of Norway's Prematurity Association (Prematurforeningen), believes the study shows that there is a need for a flexible start to school, especially for preterm babies.

"We've stated on several occasions that premature children, especially those born before what would be their full-term year, should have their school start postponed. It should absolutely be an alternative for children who clearly are not ready for school," says Nordhus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *